Subscribe to Print Edition | Sat., November 21, 2009 Kislev 4, 5770 | | Israel Time: 07:25 (EST+7)
Haaretz israel news English
web haaretz.com
Jewish World Haaretz Toolbar
Diplomacy
Defense Opinion National
Print Edition
Car Rental
Focus U.S.A. Strenger than Fiction Business Travel Magazine Week's End Anglo File Books
Share |
Opportunity for clarification

The terrible scale of the attack on America makes it not only the biggest incident in the history of modern terror, but also serves those who wish to see it as a sign of the yawning chasm between civilizations: the culture of those who adopt murder as a legitimate tool to advance their no less murderous ideas, versus the culture of tolerance and progress.

But there is no need to adopt this particular description of the attack as the pinnacle of the clash of civilizations. It seems more correct to say that this is a permanent war between those who are prepared to kill for the sake of an idea, and those who are prepared to use democratic tools to justify their path. This distinction is important at this time for the practical purposes of a precise and justified war on terrorism: to identify the enemy, to inflict damage and to neutralize his supporters.

This rule applies not only in the global war against global terrorism, but also in those same regional and local battles in which terrorism has become the preferred weapon. Sometimes, at least in the eyes of certain players, it is even considered legitimate. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the clearest example of this. The Palestinian use of terrorism against civilian targets rests on supposed idea-based arguments in an attempt to justify and legitimize terrorism.

Leaders of local movements and organizations must now declare anew their position. Are they part of global terrorism through their acceptance of local terror as a legitimate method, or are they part of those fighting terror as it is now understood and defined in light of the destroyed American buildings?

Among those who must make this decision is Yasser Arafat, who must decide whether he is prepared to withdraw his support for all terrorist organizations and acts of terror carried out in the name of the legitimate Palestinian desire for independence and an end to the occupation. Is he prepared to return to the path of the struggle for peace, to the rational confrontation that is acceptable between states? Or will he continue to supply pretexts, direct or indirect, for the terrorists to use as they wish to conduct the struggle - and thus to sully the name of the entire Palestinian movement as a producer of terrorism?

A meeting between Shimon Peres and Yasser Arafat, which has caused such a vociferous debate in Israel, could provide the opportunity to test the nature of this competition. This is a vital meeting and it is very important that it takes place now to help determine whether Arafat is willing and able to come down from the dizzy heights of his mythological image as a Palestinian leader who will settle for no less than the fanatical realization of a Palestinian utopia. Will the shock he expressed following the attack also be translated into diplomatic efforts, or is it just another one of his illusions?

This question is not just a test for Arafat. The end to the local cycle of terror also necessitates a brave response from Israel to the Palestinians in the form of a fair peace plan, one that will allow both sides to move from the armed struggle to the negotiating table
PROMOTION: Mamilla Hotel
Bookmark to del.icio.us  
 
Israel and NATO
Marking improved ties, officials say Israel warship to join NATO naval force
Stadium stopped
Israel is demanding that a nearly completed stadium in the West Bank be torn down
Special Offers
Advertisement
Eldan Rent a Car
Israel's leading car rental company offers you a 20% discount on online reservations
Date Local Jewish Singles
Ready to meet your match? Join Jdate today!
Junkyard
Junk a car - get free towing nationwide and a tax-deductible receipt
 Haaretz Hot Topics
Iran elections
Obama speech in Cairo
The Pope in the Holy Land
Durban II conference
Israel vs. Hamas
More Headlines
02:55 Six powers urge Iran to reconsider nuclear deal
23:12 Israel warship to join NATO anti-terror force
03:12 Twilight Zone / Mourning uprooted olive trees in West Bank villages
18:53 Report: IDF arrests 5 Palestinian intelligence officers
19:48 Abbas prods Brazil to help end Iran support for Hamas
20:37 Aluf Benn / The Netanyahu paradox: All-powerful except in one area
19:08 Convicts help rescue neglected Jewish cemeteries in Poland
06:13 TV ROUND-UP: Shalit deal progress; Hamas,Fatah warn of third intifada
06:15 Netanyahu to choose new attoreny general from shortlist of four
23:06 What does Israel have against a Palestinian stadium?
06:23 Report: Jerusalem stabbing of Arab nationalistically motivated
06:21 'Fatah officials warn of third Palestinian intifada'
22:48 Rabin-Clinton deal makes East Jerusalem freeze possible
Home | TV | Print Edition | Diplomacy | Opinion | Arts & Leisure | Sports | Jewish World | Site rules |
| Advert: Recommended Restaurants | Makom: Engaging on Israel
| Search engine marketing
Haaretz.com, the online edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, offers real-time breaking news, opinions and analysis from Israel and the Middle East. Haaretz.com provides extensive and in-depth coverage of Israel, the Jewish World and the Middle East, including defense, diplomacy, the Arab-Israeli conflict, the peace process, Israeli politics, Jerusalem affairs, international relations, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, the Palestinian Authority, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the Israeli business world and Jewish life in Israel and the Diaspora.
© Copyright  Haaretz. All rights reserved